17 Sep
2004
17 Sep
'04
4:13 p.m.
Patrick,
PD> No, it's not complaining about the 4th entry in node 389; it's saying PD> the node link field of node 389 of file id 4 (the catalog B*-tree), PD> i.e. the root is bad. Presumably the links (forward and backwards) PD> should be 0, unless you have an expanded root bitmap, in which case a PD> separate map node would've been added and linked in?
Thanks for the correction.
I'll check.
--
Best Regards
Pierre Duhem
Logiciels & Services Duhem, Paris (France)
duhem@macdisk.com