31 May
2001
31 May
'01
10:56 p.m.
On Thu, 31 May 2001 11:45:51 -0800, Chad Austin aegis@aegisknight.org wrote:
I suppose that's true. But then you'll have to modify MAD so it does byte packing on the structs (as all Windows structs are), and that might be a performance hit.
Either way, if MAD is to be built as a standard DLL, a binary interface must be specified.
Hmm, how about COM? when I get that DLL to work under win32 I could make a COM object to access the mad lib, and no one have to worry anymore about building a DLL.
bye Michael
--
http://www.vividos.de - michael.fink@asamnet.de - icq-uin: 6323332