Andre schrieb:
> Tim Dylla <tim.dylla(a)gmx.net> wrote:
>> MAD in contrast introduces a perceivable error right on the first
>> half wave of the sine sweep. I think, it's an overflow in the
>> requantization or the IMDCT (when I remember right, the huffman
>> decoder produces very high output at this moment).
>
> Just a hunch, but if you are able to build MAD from source, maybe you
> could try the follow patch posted to the list a few years back...
> perhaps it helps ??
>
> diff -ruN mad-0.14.2b_orig/libmad/layer3.c
> mad-0.14.2b/libmad/layer3.c
> --- mad-0.14.2b_orig/libmad/layer3.c Thu Nov 8 15:28:02 2001
> +++ mad-0.14.2b/libmad/layer3.c Tue Mar 25 15:21:12 2003
> @@ -910,7 +910,7 @@
> fprintf(stderr, "requantize overflow (%f * 2^%d)\n",
> mad_f_todouble(requantized), exp);
> # endif
> - requantized = MAD_F_MAX;
> + requantized = MAD_F_MAX / 2;
> }
> else
> requantized <<= exp;
Nope, same Result. I'm sorry, I'm still sticking with my diploma, so I
don't have the time for extensive tests right now. Maybe someone can
confirm the problem and have a look at? Feel free to contact me for the
Bitstream in Question and the correct decoder output.
Best,
Tim Dylla
>
>
> Andre
> --
>
>