6 Jun
2002
6 Jun
'02
6:48 p.m.
I have just had a look and these instructions causing the hassles are all in the file imdct_l_arm.S Is there a c alternative to this that is more portable ?
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:42:38 -0700 Rob Leslie rob@mars.org wrote:
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 07:56 AM, Gareth Bransby wrote:
Is there a way to compile the library without incurring the SMULL instructions? I recall something to do with a generic C file that
was
slower than the optimised assemly, but was platform independant, I
just
can't remember enough details to dig it out and get it working.
Try passing --enable-fpm=64bit or --enable-fpm=default to `configure'. The former will give you better accuracy (if it works), but the latter is more portable.
-- Rob Leslie rob@mars.org