Hey you MAD, MAD crowd, this is just Nawhead giving you a little lowdown
into the new release's speed improvement results. :)
I have a Celeron 400 with Windows 98 (original). I used Another Task
Manager to isolate the decoder thread and get the results. I did three
test runs on different bitrate MP3's, getting the average after at least
a minute of playback.
[please use a fixed width font to view the following table]
| 0.12.2 beta | 0.12.1 beta
---------------------------------------------------
192 Stereo | 8.67/8.85/8.58 | 9.10/9.13/9.14
160 Stereo | 8.85/8.86/8.70 | 9.32/9.16/9.26
128 Joint Stereo | 9.06/8.91/8.88 | 9.14/9.20/9.25
You can get ATM at http://web.tiscalinet.it/TbEnrHP/higheng.html and try
this test yourself.
Thanks for the release Rob!
Isn't mad supposed to be faster than mpg123? In this case, why is in_mad
much slower than in_mpg123?
Regards,
--
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
bouvigne(a)mp3-tech.org
mobile phone: gsm(a)mp3-tech.org
icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org