Does anyone compare MAD quality with NAD and Appolo decoders? I mean objective comparing with frequency analysis etc, not sayings like "smooth and deep sound of decoder"
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:04:02PM +0700, Vlad Indiukov wrote:
Does anyone compare MAD quality with NAD and Appolo decoders? I mean objective comparing with frequency analysis etc, not sayings like "smooth and deep sound of decoder"
At http://www.mp3decoders.org/ they have objective analysis of many decoders, including MAD and NAD, but I did not see any for Apollo.
that page was very interesting.
are there any similar resources on the net for comparing encoders?
Marcus Kwok wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:04:02PM +0700, Vlad Indiukov wrote:
Does anyone compare MAD quality with NAD and Appolo decoders? I mean objective comparing with frequency analysis etc, not sayings like "smooth and deep sound of decoder"
At http://www.mp3decoders.org/ they have objective analysis of many decoders, including MAD and NAD, but I did not see any for Apollo.
-- Marcus B. Kwok | 338178 Georgia Tech Station | http://angband.org/~ricecake/ Atlanta, GA 30332 | AOL Instant Messenger: SLuGHEAd78 ricecake@angband.org | ICQ: 20039767
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:04:42PM -0500, Matt Makauskas wrote:
that page was very interesting.
are there any similar resources on the net for comparing encoders?
Try http://www.r3mix.net/ or if that doesn't work then http://r3mixnet.cjb.net/ (they both go to the same page).
At 01:22 PM 1/30/01 -0500, Marcus B. Kwok wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:04:42PM -0500, Matt Makauskas wrote:
that page was very interesting.
are there any similar resources on the net for comparing encoders?
Try http://www.r3mix.net/ or if that doesn't work then http://r3mixnet.cjb.net/ (they both go to the same page).
Also try my site at:
ff123
-
ff123 -
Marcus Kwok -
Matt Makauskas -
Vlad Indiukov