20 Nov
2000
20 Nov
'00
9:34 a.m.
Isn't mad supposed to be faster than mpg123? In this case, why is in_mad much slower than in_mpg123?
Regards,
--
Gabriel Bouvigne - France bouvigne@mp3-tech.org mobile phone: gsm@mp3-tech.org icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org
20 Nov
20 Nov
6:28 p.m.
Gabriel Bouvigne bouvigne@mp3-tech.org wrote:
Isn't mad supposed to be faster than mpg123? In this case, why is in_mad much slower than in_mpg123?
MAD is only faster than mpg123 on hardware without native floating-point support.
It's not clear whether MAD can be made faster than mpg123 on x86 hardware given its fixed-point implementation, but the performance issue is still being worked on. It can certainly be improved.
Cheers,
--
Rob Leslie
rob@mars.org
8806
Age (days ago)
8806
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Gabriel Bouvigne -
Rob Leslie